According to S1 v. Turlington, what is required if ESE students are expelled?

Prepare for the FELE Educational Leadership Exam with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question has hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

In the context of S1 v. Turlington, the ruling emphasizes the importance of ensuring that students with Exceptional Student Education (ESE) services continue to receive appropriate educational support even after expulsion. This ruling establishes that the educational rights of ESE students cannot be completely severed due to disciplinary actions such as expulsion.

Therefore, if an ESE student is expelled, the school is still mandated to provide ESE services to support the student's educational needs. This requirement aligns with federal laws that protect the rights of students with disabilities, ensuring they have access to appropriate educational services regardless of their disciplinary status.

The other choices reflect different aspects of school discipline and support but do not directly address the legal requirement related to the continuous provision of ESE services post-expulsion, making the response that emphasizes the necessity of continued ESE services the correct one in this context.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy